• Home
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
    • Write for Australian Women Online
  • Advertise With Us
  • Horoscopes
  • Style
  • Shoe Boutique
  • eFashion
  • Weight Watchers Australia

Australian Women Online

Business, career, health and lifestyle content for women

  • Home
  • BLOG
  • BOOKS
  • BUSINESS
  • CAREER
  • COOKING
  • HEALTH
  • LIFESTYLE
    • Automotive
    • Beauty
    • Fashion
    • Pets
    • Relationships
    • Your Home
    • Your Money
  • TECHNOLOGY
  • TRAVEL
    • Discount Holidays
You are here: Home / BUSINESS / The Big Reason Why Your Business Transformation Project Will Fail

The Big Reason Why Your Business Transformation Project Will Fail

11 December 2018 by Australian Women Online

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp

The Big Reason Why Your Business Transformation Project Will Fail

Photo credit: U.S. Department of State. Source: flickr.com

Businesses aren’t static entities. They’re constantly evolving and looking for ways to better meet the needs of the market – or, at least, that’s the story we’ve been told. But in truth, this isn’t what companies are like. Instead, they’re in a constant state of inertia, between tension and change. And they usually only change if the situation is dire, if at all.

In short, transformation projects fail because of inertia.

Case Study: General Electric

General Electric recently fell out of the Dow Jones industrial index for the biggest industrial companies in America, after having been in the top echelons for many decades. GE has suffered enormously at the hands of new technologies and business models, to the point now where the share price of the company can no longer keep pace with more relevant rivals.

GE is a highly diversified multinational conglomerate that provides a range of services in many industries, including power generation, home appliances, security systems, railway engines, and oil and gas extraction equipment. Over the years, it has become bloated and resistant to change, with each department in the company trying to outcompete the others for management and financial resources. Within GE there is a problem of unifying the company mission: it simply has too many arms of business. And this is leading to all kinds of problems with direction and implementing real change.

Inertia Versus Action

All companies face a dilemma between inertia versus action. As https://certus3.com/ point out, the forces of inertia can be intense. Well-established companies do not like change because change usually means that some people lose out in the short-term, whether financially or otherwise. Companies develop an internal resistance to change which leads to the avoidance of risk-taking, and the development of innovation. Special interests fight to preserve the status quo, sometimes even when it becomes clear that the business will fail.

What To Do About It

The good news is that inertia isn’t a problem that cannot be overcome. It just requires the right tactics. For starters, companies should avoid relying on their internal systems to self-correct when things begin to go wrong. Instead, they should look outside the organization to external consultants who can help guide them on how to implement transformational projects.

Secondly, they need to negotiate with various stakeholders, pointing out what will happen if change does not arrive. GE didn’t realize that it was necessary to do this until it was too late. Company executives only began negotiating with managers, employees, and shareholders about the direction of the businesses once it had become eminently clear that the company was going to fail without a radical overhaul.

Finally, companies need to recognize that merely sending people off on training exercises isn’t enough to facilitate real change in their organizations. Companies must provide a context in which that training can be carried out once people return. All too often companies purchase training programmes believing that they will, by themselves, force up productivity and change working environments. They miss the obvious fact that many people simply backslide into their old habits without ongoing support in the office.

You May Also Like:

Filed Under: BUSINESS

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

New Content

  • From Spare Yard to Dream Space: How Backyard Studios Are Transforming Outdoor Living
  • Not all Technical Writers are created equal – Integris Group Services
  • Is Our Self-Esteem Formed in Our Childhood?
  • Women and Girls need more than just reproductive health care
  • Why Minimalist Games Like Aviator Are Replacing Complex Gambling Titles in Popularity
  • What to Know Before Buying Performance Plate Boats for Sale
  • Why Familiar Payment Methods Reduce Cognitive Friction in Online Casinos
  • Creating a Culture of Care and Support at Work
  • How Player Feedback Quietly Shapes Game Updates After Launch
  • Soft Glam for a Softer Night: The Rise of Moonlit Dressing in Australia

Popular Content

  • Moore Weekly Stars
  • Write for Australian Women Online
  • Advertise with Australian Women Online
  • Sass & Bide The Waltz Oversized Fit Sheer Shirt Black
  • Founder of disability travel start-up Clair Crowley wins top honours at 10th eNVIe Awards
  • More Women Needed to Change the Face of Engineering in Australia
  • Rip Curl Playa Blanca Cross Back Tri White
  • Five Excellent Tips to Create a Killer Video Content Strategy
  • Sass & Bide The Treasure Seekers Relaxed Denim Mini Dress Washed Blue
  • About

Australian Women Online © Copyright 2007 - 2025 Deborah Robinson ABN 38 119 171 979 · All Rights Reserved